Site updates at 1 PM

HOME
Local News
Sports
Weather
  Obituaries
  Occurrences
  This Week
  Web Link
   
 SPECIAL FEATURES
     
 ENTERTAINMENT
Horoscopes
  Lottery
TV
  CUSTOMER SERVICE
Get the paper
  Place a Classified Ad
  Advertising Rate Schedule
Our Staff
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Submit Announcements
FAQ's

Fiscal court approves list Park Board must agree to
Melodie Phelps
News Editor

Fiscal court approved a list of conditions that the Park Board must

agree to before county funding is restored to Memorial Park. The action came

during a special meeting Thursday afternoon.

The county has held funding for Memorial Park since May, when they first

discussed some problems at the facility. At that time, County

Judge-Executive Bruce Ramsey talked about personnel problems at the park and

referred to an incident report that had been filed by Jailer Ray Upchurch.

The report apparently dealt with an incident that involved inmates who were

on work detail at the park.

The issue hadnıt been discussed again by the county, until Thursdayıs

meeting. Ramsey and the magistrates had received hand-delivered letters from

Park Board Chairman Fount Blevins last week that indicated the county had

forfeited their representation on the Park Board because of the funding

restriction.

Ramsey read the letter aloud during the special session. In it, Blevins

stated that some repair and maintenance, that was scheduled to be done this

fall at the park, may be delayed because of limited funds.

"If the Wayne County Fiscal Court chooses to fund the park and release

their funds by September 15, the board will remain the same," the letter

stated. "There cannot be any changes in members. If the Wayne County Fiscal

Court does not choose to release the funds before this date, they will not

be considered for representation on the Park Board until the year 2007."

Blevins states in the letter that he hopes the problem can be resolved.

Ramsey then presented his list of conditions, which he said he had also

shown to Mayor Thurston Frye. The conditions included an annual audit for

the Park Board, a complete inventory of all equipment owned by the park,

bonding for the Park Board treasurer, and submission of minutes of each Park

Board meeting.

The conditions also noted that board members and local media be timely

notified of Park Board meetings, and that board members be instructed

concerning their duties. The conditions also stated that Park Board members

are not allowed to slander anyone.

The list also included a stipulation that any employee suspected of

alcohol and/or drug abuse or any illegal activity be dismissed immediately.

District One Magistrate Jerry Sloan questioned the countyıs policy

regarding alcohol and drug use. County Attorney Lee Tobbe reviewed the

policy and noted that it is a "zero tolerance policy."

Tobbe noted that any employee with a blood alcohol content of .04 or

greater will be dismissed under the policy. The policy also has procedures

set up, that include a hearing at the employeeıs request.

District Four Magistrate Wade Upchurch questioned the term "suspected"

in the alcohol and drug policy. "I wouldnıt want to lose my job because

somebody came through and suspected me of drinking," he said.

Ramsey noted that one of the biggest problems is the Park Board hasnıt

been holding regular meetings.

"They hadnıt met in two years...I think that is a problem," stated

Ramsey.

Sloan said he felt that the county, the city and the Park Board should

sit down and work some of these things out.

"Tax dollars spent wisely out there are good for all the people," stated

Sloan.

Ramsey noted that the county has not taken one penny away from the park,

the only opted to hold that money until there were some things worked out.

"I think over the past 15-20 years the Park Board has worked hard and

run a park that is an asset to our community, and they ought to be

commended," stated Upchurch. "What they had done has been a commendable

job."

Sloan asked about who actually owns the park. Ramsey said the deed in is

the name of the City of Monticello, but an ordinance approved in 1982 makes

the park a joint venture between the city and the county.

District Two Magistrate Jess Jones made a motion to approve the list of

conditions and forward them to the City Council and the Park Board. Sloan

seconded the motion and it was approved by a 3-1 vote.

Upchurch was opposed and noted that he objected to the portion that

referred to "suspected" use of alcohol or drugs, as well as the portion

regarding slanderous statements.

The court then entered a 40-minute executive session to discuss a

personnel matter. Trooper Parrish Baker spoke to the fiscal court members

during the closed door session.

When the magistrates returned to open session, Ramsey requested that the

court give Tobbe a directive to work with City Attorney Jay Jones to explain

to Park Board members their duties and limitations.

Tobbe said that he and Jones would report back to city and county

officials after speaking with the Park Board.

Upchurch asked if the county would continue to hold funds from the park.

Ramsey indicated that if the Park Board does not agree to abide by the

conditions approved by the court that the county would not release funds.

If an agreement is reached, Ramsey said funds would be released and

would retroactive to May.



Add a comment



@ 2005 The Wayne County Outlook    For more information, see our online Privacy Policy.